Renaissance Group awarded $28.7 million


Font size: [A] [A] [A]

ST. CROIX - A jury awarded St. Croix Renaissance Group more than $28.7 million in damages Thursday in U.S. District Court, finding that St. Croix Alumina failed to disclose toxic "red mud" on the property it sold in 2002, court files show.

The massive judgement dates back to 2004, when the case first was filed - the same year the V.I. Department of Planning and Natural Resources filed a suit against a number of former aluminum manufacturers for environmental damages caused by the red mud - a toxic by-product of turning bauxite ore into alumina.

One of those manufacturers was St. Croix Alumina, which is a subsidiary of Alcoa Inc., the worldwide aluminum company.

The trial spanned 10 days before District Judge Harvey Bartle III.

St. Croix attorneys Joel Holt and Carl Hartmann III represented Renaissance.

St. Croix Alumina was ordered to pay St. Croix Renaissance Group $12,617,867 for a breach of warranty and fraud, another $6,142,856 for punitive damages and an additional $10 million for negligence. The total amount awarded is $28,742,723.

The case concerns a 1,400-acre property now owned by the St. Croix Renaissance Park. It went from comprising commercial plantations in the 18th century to becoming the center of a manufacturing hub in 1962, when Harvey Aluminum Corp. began developing the property to begin manufacturing aluminum, according to the St. Croix Renaissance Group's Web site. During the next 40 years, a number of aluminum-manufacturing companies took over the site, the last company to do so being St. Croix Alumina.

St. Croix Renaissance Group purchased the property in 2002. It dismantled the processing units with the intention of rehabilitating the site for industrial use.

Currently, Diageo's site is on part of the St. Croix Renaissance Group's property.

The civil complaint claims St. Croix Alumina failed to disclose the prior releases of red mud from 1992 through just before the purchase in 2002, as was stipulated in a warranty on the purchasing contract. The complaint also asserts that St. Croix Alumina fraudulently covered up the releases and tried to avoid oversight by DPNR.

After St. Croix Renaissance Group found evidence of a "red mud event" in April 2002, before the contract was signed, St. Croix Alumina officials told the prospective purchasers that it was a "one time" incident knowing that to be false, the complaint said.

St. Croix Renaissance Group claimed that such cover-ups took place throughout the discovery process while they reviewed the purchase of the property.

We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
\

Best of the VI

Best of the VI: After more than 100,000 text and Facebook votes were cast, it is time to unveil the winners.

Daily News

Try our e-newspaper delivered to you every day

Island Trader

Good stuff, best buys, great fun

Crucian Trader

Celebrating St. Croix History, Culture and People

Island Action

Your complete guide to where to go and what to do this week in the Virgin Islands.